Attorney Paul M. Sullivan has updated his monograph “Killing Aloha”, which is a point-by-point rebuttal to the Akaka bill. The monograph includes several wonderful cartoons by Daryl Cagle related to Rice v. Cayetano and to Hawaii’s racial entitlement programs. Some of Mr. Sullivan’s comments draw upon important historical and legal issues from the Kingdom of Hawaii (such as Rex v. Booth). This new 65-page version of “Killing Aloha” is approximately one megabyte, and can be downloaded from
http://tinyurl.com/yefy8od
“Killing Aloha” updated 65-page point by point analysis of Akaka bill by attorney Paul M. Sullivan
Nov 19
A book review has been written of “Hawaii — The Fake State (A Manifesto and Expose of a Nation in Captivity)” by Aran Alton Ardaiz
Even though the book itself is worthless, this review provides some interesting information about the sovereignty movement. We enjoy hearty laughter at the irrational thought process of some sovereignty activists and the absurdities they put forward as truth. Folks might also be surprised by the criminal activities some activists engage in as part of their effort to rip the 50th star off the flag by undermining the sovereignty of the United States in the State of Hawaii through tax evasion, filing fake legal documents, and refusing to comply with licensing regulations.
The book also addresses numerous widely scattered topics that seem popular among conspiracy theorists who wear tinfoil hats to prevent the Martians from reading their minds. Many Hawaiian sovereignty activists seem attracted to conspiracy theories. The book review identifies some of those topics briefly.
The book does make some substantive claims regarding alleged illegality of the revolution of 1893, the annexation of 1898, and the statehood vote of 1959. All the substantive claims are rebutted by a series of well-documented webpages whose links are provided at the end of the book review.
Please read the book review at
http://tinyurl.com/lhc3zv
David Sai is perhaps most well known for his Perfect Title scam, for which he recieved a felony conviction. In a recent email shared on hawaiiankingdom.info, in which he refers to his conviction as a “so-called felony,” Mr. Sai gives his take on the recent SCOTUS decision which eviscerated the so-called “Apology Resolution” and its whereas clauses.
In 1993, radical activists managed to pass PL103-150, otherwise known as the “Apology Resolution.” The resolution itself was based on the writings of a single activist author, Davianna McGregor, and went through no vetting process to establish whether or not any of the “whereas” clauses regarding the history of the Hawaiian Islands and the Hawaiian Revolution of 1893 were accurate. It was passed through the Senate with limited debate and assurances that it was a “simple apology,” and was passed by the House of Representatives with no debate at all through a voice vote. It was stealth legislation of the lowest order, and its passage has reverberated with adverse consequences for the past 16 years.
Dear Mr. Obama,
As the final days count down to your inauguration, I would like to share with you one very specific hope and its corollary fear I have. Throughout your campaign, although I did not support your candidacy, I greatly admired your rhetoric on race and race relations. As the first “hapa” president, although you and I don’t share specific bloodlines, we do share the experience of being built and raised struggling with the idea of whether or not we were “half” this or “half” that, or a “whole” something else. I believe the answer we both arrived at is that we are “whole” people, and that beyond “black” and “white” we are both in fact “human.”
Amicus brief jointly by the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii and the Southeastern Legal Foundation
Amicus brief jointly by the Pacific Legal Foundation, the Cato Institute, and the Center for Equal Opportunity
Amicus brief by the Mountain States Legal Foundation
Amicus brief of the Commissioner of Public Lands for the State of New Mexico
Amicus brief of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence
To see what the “bad guys” think about the State’s position on ceded lands, look at
Governor Lingle’s main motive for supporting the Akaka bill, OHA, race-based entitlements, and Kamehameha Schools’ racially exclusionary admissions policy is her strong support for Zionism and her mistaken belief that the Hawaiian sovereignty movement is comparable to the struggle to establish and maintain a Jewish nation of Israel. See webpage
In mid-November 2008 the Honolulu Advertiser reported that the FBI is investigating a scam whereby Hawaiian Kingdom bonds are being sold to people for use in paying off mortgages. Several foreclosures have resulted when people stopped paying their mortgages because they “paid” their debt by using the bonds. Andrew Walden has published a major article in Hawaii Free Press exposing the names of individuals and Hawaiian sovereignty groups which the mainstream media seem to be concealing. See:
http://tinyurl.com/676tl6
Thurston Twigg-Smith is the grandson of Lorrin A. Thurston, a major leader of the revolution which overthrew the Hawaii monarchy in 1893. Mr. Twigg-Smith’s book, “Hawaiian Sovereignty: Do the Facts Matter?” provides historical details and a valuable perspective. Two chapters are of special relevance today: Chapter 9 (land) and Chapter 10 (the 1993 apology resolution). Those chapters deserve careful reading in view of the U.S. Supreme Court decision to consider the state’s appeal of the Hawaii Supreme Court decision that the state is prohibited from selling any ceded lands until the claims of ethnic Hawaiians have been resolved — the Hawaii court based its decision largely on the 1993 apology resolution. Mr. Twigg-Smith has generously agreed to have his entire book posted on the internet in pdf format, so that anyone can read it free of charge. Click this URL, or copy and paste it into your browser, to download the book:
Book review of Jon Van Dyke “Who Owns the Crown Lands of Hawaii?”
Apr 15
Posted by Ken Conklin in Commentary, Reference, Reviews | No Comments
Book review by attorney Paul M. Sullivan, published in UH Law Review:
http://tinyurl.com/ctbopx
Sullivan’s book review in the context of other materials about the ceded lands and the recent Supreme Court decision:
http://tinyurl.com/chbkpx