Comments on: A Property Rights View http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/ Correcting historical revisionism and misconceptions promoted by the Akaka Bill Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:08:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-98 Anonymous Thu, 04 May 2006 20:47:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-98 No, no, no: this is a war between tribal and royalism. Royalism plus missionaries equals Cult of Kamehameha, KSBE is behind Akaka bill. OHA merely dupes of KSBE. Think about it: Sons and daughters of Chinese immigrants run KSBE today. They kept tribal out of Hawaii to keep way clear for Akaka bill. Akaka bill is not tribal. It's a new category predicated in royalism. It's a subrogation scheme designed to cement the power of KSBE. Wake up, people. Senator Inouye works for KSBE. No, no, no: this is a war between tribal and royalism. Royalism plus missionaries equals Cult of Kamehameha, KSBE is behind Akaka bill. OHA merely dupes of KSBE. Think about it: Sons and daughters of Chinese immigrants run KSBE today. They kept tribal out of Hawaii to keep way clear for Akaka bill. Akaka bill is not tribal. It’s a new category predicated in royalism. It’s a subrogation scheme designed to cement the power of KSBE. Wake up, people. Senator Inouye works for KSBE.

]]> By: Roy Sokolowski http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-97 Roy Sokolowski Thu, 04 May 2006 18:57:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-97 The Hawaiian monarchy was not overthrown by less than 300 US troops. Not a single shot was fired by any of these troops. The overthrow was accomplished by citizens of the kingdom (former American citizens). Like it or not, at the time of the overthrow the kingdom had become so weak that a bunch of plantation owners could assume control without firing a shot. The Hawaiian monarchy was not overthrown by less than 300 US troops. Not a single shot was fired by any of these troops. The overthrow was accomplished by citizens of the kingdom (former American citizens). Like it or not, at the time of the overthrow the kingdom had become so weak that a bunch of plantation owners could assume control without firing a shot.

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-96 Anonymous Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:17:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-96 Dogs and cats are now living together in peace and harmony? Dont worry about the past deal with issue let them live???????????Shut the hell up Dogs and cats are now living together in peace and harmony? Dont worry about the past deal with issue let them live???????????Shut the hell up

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-95 Anonymous Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:11:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-95 Here is an interesting article with a universal message well worth contemplating. "Dangers of the Herd" by Louis Rene Beres http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060227-093416-9462r.htm Here is an interesting article with a universal message well worth contemplating.

“Dangers of the Herd” by Louis Rene Beres

http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060227-093416-9462r.htm

]]> By: Magnanimous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-94 Magnanimous Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:51:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-94 I think you failed to get the point. Hatred doesn't solve anything. Look at the Middle East. The Israeli/Palestinian conflict has cost the World too much and there is no end in sight. If emotions are allowed to rule over reason than we no longer live in a civilized place. There are many Hawaiians who do not support the Akaka Bill nor sovereignty but have kept quiet for fear of rebuttal or downright nastiness from people in this community. Hawaiians are not an endangered species and many earn more money than the average worker in this state. Nobody owes them a living just because they descend from the inhabitant of these islands prior to the arrival of Capt. Cook. In addition, anyone born here and calls this home is a native. Anyone raised here and knows only these islands and does not identify with any other place is native enough. It is because of the refusal to recognize that the fundamental right to life has no boundaries nor belongs to an ethnicity that this problem exists. The Hawaiian Homestead Act of 1920 was flawed from the beginning. It has sealed the fate of Hawaiians to live as serfs. The fight should be directed at the DHHL and OHA; not the same old tiresome rhetoric of the overthrow. The Government has a moral obligation to recognize the fundamental right to life. Right the wrong done in 1920 and recognize the right to private property for those entitled; settling this once and for all. I think you failed to get the point.

Hatred doesn’t solve anything. Look at the Middle East. The Israeli/Palestinian conflict has cost the World too much and there is no end in sight. If emotions are allowed to rule over reason than we no longer live in a civilized place.

There are many Hawaiians who do not support the Akaka Bill nor sovereignty but have kept quiet for fear of rebuttal or downright nastiness from people in this community.

Hawaiians are not an endangered species and many earn more money than the average worker in this state. Nobody owes them a living just because they descend from the inhabitant of these islands prior to the arrival of Capt. Cook. In addition, anyone born here and calls this home is a native. Anyone raised here and knows only these islands and does not identify with any other place is native enough.

It is because of the refusal to recognize that the fundamental right to life has no boundaries nor belongs to an ethnicity that this problem exists. The Hawaiian Homestead Act of 1920 was flawed from the beginning. It has sealed the fate of Hawaiians to live as serfs. The fight should be directed at the DHHL and OHA; not the same old tiresome rhetoric of the overthrow. The Government has a moral obligation to recognize the fundamental right to life. Right the wrong done in 1920 and recognize the right to private property for those entitled; settling this once and for all.

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-93 Anonymous Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:56:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-93 >If not there would be no discussion or this blog existence otherwise???? >If not there would be no discussion or this blog existence otherwise????

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-92 Anonymous Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:39:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-92 If everyone's name is anonymous, what comment belongs to whom? Who's comment is being responded to if everyone has the same name? Don't everyone respond at once then we'll really be confused as to who said what. If everyone’s name is anonymous, what comment belongs to whom?

Who’s comment is being responded to if everyone has the same name?

Don’t everyone respond at once then we’ll really be confused as to who said what.

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-91 Anonymous Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:35:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-91 Can't you do better than that? I fail to see your point because there is no argument in your statement. Can’t you do better than that? I fail to see your point because there is no argument in your statement.

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-90 Anonymous Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:05:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-90 Historical pictures, presidential excerpts, even joint resolutions prove that there was an act of war, and americas evolvement was unlawful. If not there would be no discussion or this blog existence otherwise???? Historical pictures, presidential excerpts, even joint resolutions prove that there was an act of war, and americas evolvement was unlawful.

If not there would be no discussion or this blog existence otherwise????

]]> By: Anonymous http://historymystery.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-89 Anonymous Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:17:00 +0000 http://akakatalka.grassrootinstitute.org/2006/02/15/a-property-rights-view/#comment-89 There was no "Act of War" because there were no shots fired. It was the Queen Liliuokalani who wanted to impose a new Constitution that "usurped" the existing one and gave her dictitorial powers that the Cabinet balked at. This is what spurred the Revolution and there is no evidence that the U.S. forces had any hand in it. There was no “Act of War” because there were no shots fired.

It was the Queen Liliuokalani who wanted to impose a new Constitution that “usurped” the existing one and gave her dictitorial powers that the Cabinet balked at.

This is what spurred the Revolution and there is no evidence that the U.S. forces had any hand in it.

]]>